Explore the complexities of post-acquisition contract consents through an insightful case study on a high-stakes $80 million acquisition. This blog post delves into the challenges faced when key business value is linked to contracts requiring third-party consent, as exemplified by…
Blog Archives
M&A Buyer Challenges Seller’s NY Anti-Reliance Clause in Fraud Suit
Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions through the lens of a recent legal battle in Brooklyn, where a buyer challenges a seller’s anti-reliance clause after a business deal goes awry. This insightful blog delves into the importance of clearly defining…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, asset purchase, Brooklyn trial court, Business acquisitions, business litigation, buyer protections, Case Study, commercial litigation, contract law, fraud suit, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Precedents, M&A dispute, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction tips, net income misrepresentation, New York law, Purchase agreement, representations and warranties, seller strategies
M&A Health Care Seller Fights Large Buyer over Medicare and Medicaid Reconciliation
In this blog post, we delve into the complexities of selling a healthcare business, particularly focusing on a recent M&A legal dispute involving Medicare and Medicaid receivables. Discover how a Montana-based home health and hospice provider clashed with a large…
Posted in problems with receivables Tagged with: Acquisition Agreements, escrow, escrow in M&A, federal district court rulings, financial reconciliation, healthcare business sale, healthcare industry, healthcare mergers and acquisitions, healthcare regulations, home health and hospice care, Indemnification claims, legal strategy in M&A, M&A case studies, M&A Disputes, M&A legal issues, Medicaid receivables, Medicare receivables, post-closing receivables, prejudgment remedy, receivables management, reconciliation, Regulatory Compliance
M&A Bankruptcy Auction Buyer’s Liability to Another Bidder
Discover the complexities of M&A transactions within bankruptcy contexts in our latest blog post, “M&A Bankruptcy Auction: Buyer’s Liability to Another Bidder.” This insightful piece delves into a recent case where a prospective buyer of a distressed business navigates the…
Posted in bankruptcy sale, distressed business acquisitions Tagged with: Asset acquisition, bankruptcy auction, bankruptcy sales order, Bed Bath and Beyond bankruptcy, business data, Buyer's liability, contract breach, Distressed Business Acquisition, federal district court, financial models, Go Global Retail v. Dream On Me, high-stakes environment, injunction, internet properties, legal doctrine, legal ramifications, M&A legal issues, Manhattan federal district court, New Jersey supplier, post-acquisition phases, Proprietary information, res judicata, strategic analyses, trade secrets, trademark acquisition
Coal Mine Buyer’s Post-Closing Legal Battle Over Reclamation Costs
Explore a detailed analysis of a complex legal battle over reclamation costs following an $88 million bankruptcy acquisition of a coal mine in Pennsylvania. Our latest M&A blog delves into the intricacies of environmental compliance, permit transfers, and the crucial…
Posted in environmental problems Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement clarity, Bankruptcy acquisition, buyer obligations in M&A, coal mine permits, contract ambiguity, environmental compliance, external evidence in legal disputes, federal district court, industry-specific legal challenges, legal documentation in M&A, legal skirmishes, M&A legal issues, M&A risk mitigation, M&A transaction pitfalls, Pennsylvania coal mine acquisition, permit transfer disputes, post-closing legal battles, reclamation costs, Seller obligations
M&A Seller Asks Court to Order Buyer to Close Acquisition
Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions in our latest blog post, where we delve into a landmark legal ruling that forced a buyer to close a $277 million acquisition. Discover the legal principles and court decisions that emphasize the importance…
Posted in specific performance Tagged with: breach of M&A agreement, buyer refusal to close, casualty reinsurance acquisition, commercial division Manhattan court ruling, final purchase price determination, industry-specific M&A legal trends, James River Group Holdings v. Fleming Intermediate Holdings, legal grounds in M&A deals, legal principles in M&A transactions, legal recourse in M&A, M&A case studies, M&A court rulings, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction disputes, mandatory injunction in mergers, mergers and acquisitions litigation, New York Supreme Court Commercial Division M&A decisions, purchase agreement enforcement, reinsurance reserves dispute, specific performance in M&A
M&A Buyer’s Earnout Risk
Explore the complexities of M&A transactions with a deep dive into the legal battles surrounding earnouts. This post dissects a real-world case involving a $226 million acquisition in the insurance industry, where the buyer alleges overpayment due to fraudulent earnout…
Posted in problems with earnouts Tagged with: acquisition agreement compliance, acquisition financial targets, Breach of contract in M&A, buyer earnout risk, Earnout disputes, earnout structuring, federal district court M&A cases, financial misrepresentation, fraud in mergers and acquisitions, good faith in business deals, insurance brokerage M&A, legal implications of earnouts, legal strategies in M&A, M&A case studies, M&A deal risk management, M&A industry insights, M&A legal issues, M&A litigation, PCF Insurance Services case, Post-closing disputes, private equity acquisition
Recent Comments