Explore the intricate world of enforcing restrictive covenants in M&A transactions with our latest blog post. Dive into a compelling case study involving a $20 million acquisition in the education and risk management sector. We delve into the legal challenges…
Blog Archives
Recovering Legal Fees When Enforcing M&A Restrictive Covenants
Posted in Attorney's Fee Provision, noncompetition covenant Tagged with: Appellate court decisions, asset purchase agreement clauses, Compensatory Damages, Delaware law, education sector mergers, enforcing non-compete agreements, injunctions in M&A cases, legal challenges in M&A, legal fees in M&A disputes, litigation management industry, M&A case studies, M&A Restrictive Covenants, risk management acquisitions
M&A Buyer Challenges Seller’s NY Anti-Reliance Clause in Fraud Suit
Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions through the lens of a recent legal battle in Brooklyn, where a buyer challenges a seller’s anti-reliance clause after a business deal goes awry. This insightful blog delves into the importance of clearly defining…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, asset purchase, Brooklyn trial court, Business acquisitions, business litigation, buyer protections, Case Study, commercial litigation, contract law, fraud suit, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Precedents, M&A dispute, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction tips, net income misrepresentation, New York law, Purchase agreement, representations and warranties, seller strategies
Lawsuit Over EBITDA Earnout Dispute
Explore a post-closing dispute in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving an earnout disagreement related to EBITDA. Learn about a case that highlights the complexities of earnout arrangements and potential legal challenges. June 18, 2019 M&A Stories Introduction: In this mergers…
Posted in bad faith, corporate overhead, de facto merger exception, earn outs, EBITDA Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, corporate overhead, earnout disagreements, EBITDA earnout dispute, fair dealing, Good faith, income expectations, legal challenges in M&A, M&A Disputes, M&A lawsuit, Miranda v. US Security Associates, Post-Closing Dispute
M&A Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause: How They Impact Seller Claims
Explore the crucial role of the APA Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause in a recent M&A case involving a Denver-based seller and a Houston-based buyer. Discover key allegations, the seller’s claim, the court’s decision, and the legal obstacles faced…
Posted in earn out, economic loss doctrine, exclusive remedy, integration clause Tagged with: Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business Closure, Case Reference: In Re Allonhill, Colorado Choice of Law, Contractual Remedies, Court's Decision, Denver-Based Seller, Earnout Payments, economic loss rule, Exclusive Remedy Clause, Houston-Based Buyer, integration clause, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Provisions in M&A, LLC, M&A Integration Provision, M&A legal blog, Material Misrepresentations, Negligent Misrepresentation, Seller Claims, Tort Liability
Recent Comments