Explore the complexities of M&A survival clauses in our latest blog post, ‘Wisconsin Court Examines M&A Survival Clause.’ This insightful analysis delves into a recent Wisconsin appellate court decision involving a strategic acquisition dispute. The case uncovers the critical role…
Blog Archives
Wisconsin Court Examines M&A Survival Clause
Posted in survival of reps and warranties Tagged with: ABA Model Asset Purchase Agreement, Appellate court ruling, Asset purchase agreements, Breach of contract, Business acquisition, Business disputes, business law, buyer protection, case law review, Commercial Law, commercial litigation, contract interpretation, legal analysis, Legal disputes in M&A, legal insights, Legal Precedents, M&A best practices, M&A law, M&A litigation, M&A Transactions, representations and warranties, Seller liability, strategic acquisition, strategic water distribution acquisition, survival clauses, undisclosed liabilities, Wisconsin appellate court, Wisconsin state court
M&A Buyer Challenges Seller’s NY Anti-Reliance Clause in Fraud Suit
Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions through the lens of a recent legal battle in Brooklyn, where a buyer challenges a seller’s anti-reliance clause after a business deal goes awry. This insightful blog delves into the importance of clearly defining…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, asset purchase, Brooklyn trial court, Business acquisitions, business litigation, buyer protections, Case Study, commercial litigation, contract law, fraud suit, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Precedents, M&A dispute, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction tips, net income misrepresentation, New York law, Purchase agreement, representations and warranties, seller strategies
The Reach of a Forum Selection Clause: Can M&A Buyer’s Fraud Suit against Seller and Multiple Owners and Managers Be Tried in Delaware?
Dive into the complexities of M&A forum selection clauses with our latest blog post, which analyzes a case where a buyer’s fraud suit against a seller and multiple managers and owners was partially dismissed in Delaware. The court ruled in…
Posted in fraud in business sale, Problems with financials, problems with forum selection clauses Tagged with: acquisition disputes, Chumash Capital Investments case, commercial litigation, complex commercial litigation, corporate litigation, cross-jurisdictional legal issues, defense contractor acquisition, Delaware corporate law, Delaware Superior Court, Forum Selection Clauses, Fraud in M&A, fraudulent financial statements, Grand Mesa Partners lawsuit, legal complexities in M&A, legal strategy in M&A, Litigation strategy, M&A legal disputes, M&A legal topics, M&A Transactions, multi-defendant litigation, multi-jurisdictional litigation
Recent Comments