Explore the intricacies of M&A legal topics with our latest blog post, “Texas Upholds Asset Acquisition Formality: Successor Liability Limited to Assumed Seller Liabilities.” This piece delves into the unique legal landscape of Texas, contrasting its strict adherence to the…
Blog Archives
Texas Upholds Asset Acquisition Formality: Successor Liability Limited to Assumed Seller Liabilities
Posted in problems with successor liability Tagged with: Acquisition Agreements, Asset acquisition, Business acquisitions, business bankruptcy, buyer protections, choice of law provision, Contractual obligations, Corporate governance, creditor claims, creditor-friendly laws, industry regulations, Legal Strategies, liability assumptions, M&A, merger implications, successor liability, Texas courts, Texas law, tort liabilities, transaction structuring
M&A Seller Learns a Painful Lesson on Defending Indemnification and Setoff Claims
Discover the critical lessons from a real M&A legal dispute where a seller’s failure to adhere to post-closing dispute procedures led to significant financial consequences. This blog delves into the importance of indemnification provisions, the role of representations and warranties,…
Posted in indemnification, objection -reasonable detail, timely objection to indemnification claim Tagged with: Alabama Supreme Court ruling, Alabama-based business, asset purchase agreement, asset recovery, brake-plate facility, Breach of contract, Business acquisition, business legal lessons, buyer protections, Buyer-seller disputes, environmental issues in M&A, Financial difficulties, hidden business problems, Indemnification claims, legal fees in M&A, legal recourse in M&A, M&A agreements, M&A industry, M&A legal disputes, M&A transaction procedures, Post-closing disputes, representations and warranties, Seller obligations, setoff claims, South Korean customer, vendor invoices
M&A Buyer Challenges Seller’s NY Anti-Reliance Clause in Fraud Suit
Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions through the lens of a recent legal battle in Brooklyn, where a buyer challenges a seller’s anti-reliance clause after a business deal goes awry. This insightful blog delves into the importance of clearly defining…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, asset purchase, Brooklyn trial court, Business acquisitions, business litigation, buyer protections, Case Study, commercial litigation, contract law, fraud suit, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Precedents, M&A dispute, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction tips, net income misrepresentation, New York law, Purchase agreement, representations and warranties, seller strategies
Buyer’s Ability to Sue Seller for Fraud in Delaware “As Is” Deal
Explore the legal implications of fraud in M&A deals, particularly in cases where buyers agree to purchase assets “as is” without explicit assurances. Learn from a real case study and understand the importance of representations and warranties in protecting buyers’…
Recent Comments