Explore the complexities of M&A survival clauses in our latest blog post, ‘Wisconsin Court Examines M&A Survival Clause.’ This insightful analysis delves into a recent Wisconsin appellate court decision involving a strategic acquisition dispute. The case uncovers the critical role…
Blog Archives
Wisconsin Court Examines M&A Survival Clause
Posted in survival of reps and warranties Tagged with: ABA Model Asset Purchase Agreement, Appellate court ruling, Asset purchase agreements, Breach of contract, Business acquisition, Business disputes, business law, buyer protection, case law review, Commercial Law, commercial litigation, contract interpretation, legal analysis, Legal disputes in M&A, legal insights, Legal Precedents, M&A best practices, M&A law, M&A litigation, M&A Transactions, representations and warranties, Seller liability, strategic acquisition, strategic water distribution acquisition, survival clauses, undisclosed liabilities, Wisconsin appellate court, Wisconsin state court
Clarifying Buyer’s Set-Off Provision in M&A Deals for Unresolved Indemnity Claims
Gain insights into the legal complexities of using set-off provisions in M&A transactions. Understand how disputes over indemnity claims can impact post-closing payments and buyer protections. M&A Stories October 14, 2020 Introduction: When a business buyer purchases another company, they…
Buyer Halts Payments, Alleges Inaccurate Financials in M&A Deal
Explore a case where a buyer halted payments in an M&A deal due to alleged financial inaccuracies, and learn about offset provisions in purchase agreements. M&A Stories March 29, 2019 Introduction: In the world of mergers and acquisitions, uncertainties loom…
Posted in asset purchase agreement, financial representation and warranty, membership interest purchase agreement, offset or setoff provision, offset right, promissory note, representations and warranties Tagged with: Acquisition Agreements, books and records representation, Borremans v. Gardner, buyer protection, escrow, financial inaccuracies, Legal Case, M&A, Mergers and Acquisitions, New York State Court, offset or setoff provision, Purchase agreement, seller dispute
Court Decision: Buyer Unable to Sue Seller for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in Target’s Data Room
Dive into the intricate world of M&A transactions with our latest blog post on an important Delaware court decision. Uncover the legal nuances surrounding buyer-seller relationships, data room disclosures, and the impact of contractual agreements. Gain valuable insights into the…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, Breach of contract, Business acquisitions, buyer protection, Buyer-seller relationships, Chyronhego Corporation v. Wight, Contractual agreements, data room disclosures, Delaware court decision, due diligence, financial projections, fraudulent misrepresentations, Indemnification caps, Industry Insights, industry-specific coverage, legal analysis, Legal Developments, legal implications, legal recourse, M&A deals, M&A Transactions, seller responsibilities, stock purchase agreement
Buyer’s Remedies in “As Is Where Is” M&A Deals: Navigating Fraud Claims
Dive into the complexities of M&A legalities with our latest blog post, exploring buyer remedies in ‘as is where is’ deals and navigating fraud claims. Learn how legal precedents and contractual provisions shape buyer recourse against fraudulent misrepresentations, and discover…
Posted in "as is where is", fraud in business sale Tagged with: as is where is deals, asset purchase agreement, buyer protection, buyer remedies, case reference, comprehensive due diligence, contractual provisions, due diligence, Environmental liabilities, fraud claims, Legal battles, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, legal recourse, M&A legal, M&A Transactions, Mergers and Acquisitions, regulatory scrutiny, Seller liability
Recent Comments