In this engaging M&A blog post, we dive into a compelling legal case where a buyer successfully blocked a seller’s bankruptcy discharge over a $225,000 non-compete violation. Through this case study, we highlight the crucial importance of adhering to non-competition…
Blog Archives
M&A Buyer Blocks Seller’s Bankruptcy Discharge Over $225K Non-Compete Violation
Posted in Problem with seller owner's competition Tagged with: bankruptcy court rulings, bankruptcy discharge, business competition, business law, business legalities, Business owners, business protection strategies, federal district court judgment, Legal compliance, Legal consequences, legal insights, Legal Risks in M&A, M&A case studies, M&A Disputes, M&A industry, M&A legal topics, M&A strategies, Mergers and Acquisitions, non-compete agreement, non-compete covenant violation, Non-compete enforcement, patent infringement, protecting business goodwill, seller's bankruptcy, willful patent infringement
Navigating Earnout Disputes in M&A: Insights from Dolce v. WTS International, LLC
Delve into the intricate world of M&A earnouts with insights from the landmark Dolce v. WTS International, LLC case. Explore the complexities and risks involved in earnout disputes, including the crucial role of EBITDA calculations. Gain valuable lessons on navigating…
Posted in problems with earnouts Tagged with: Business owners, Business Transactions, Case Study, contract law, Corporate transactions, Delaware Court of Chancery, Dolce v. WTS International LLC, Earnout disputes, EBITDA calculation, Entrepreneurial insights, expert determination, financial scrutiny, industry analysis, legal complexities, Legal Disputes, Legal Precedents, legal proceedings, Litigation, M&A, Mergers and Acquisitions
Navigating Trademark Pitfalls in M&A: Lessons from Nutradose Labs Case
Explore the intricate world of M&A legalities with our latest blog post, “Navigating Trademark Pitfalls in M&A: Lessons from Nutradose Labs Case.” Delve into the riveting case of Nutradose Labs, LLC v. Bio Dose Pharma, LLC, as we unravel the…
Posted in trademark infringement Tagged with: Asset sales, Bankruptcy proceedings, Board members, Business brokers, business growth, Business owners, Business ventures, case reference, CEOs, CFOs, Court rulings, Entrepreneurship, ESOP professionals, Investment bankers, Lawyers, Legal consequences, Legal Precedents, M&A acquisitions, M&A landscape, M&A legalities, Nutradose Labs case, Trademark Infringement, Trademark license agreement, Trademark rights, United States District Court S.D. Florida, wealth advisers
Lawsuit Over Auto Dealership Franchise Sale: A Closer Look
Explore a legal battle over an auto dealership franchise sale in Pennsylvania. Get insights into the M&A deal, GM’s actions, the court’s decision, and the importance of legal compliance. This case has implications for entrepreneurs, business owners, and lawyers. M&A…
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Expansive Noncompetition Covenant in Recent M&A Case
Explore the legal implications of the Palmetto Mortuary Transport case where the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld a seller’s noncompetition agreement in an M&A deal. Gain insights into noncompetition covenants, risk mitigation strategies, and the evolving landscape of business acquisitions.…
Posted in covenant not to compete, reformation, step-down provision Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Business acquisitions, Business owners, Court Blue-Pencil Noncompetition covenant, legal implications, M&A legal development, Mortuary transport services, noncompetition covenant, Palmetto Mortuary Transport case, Risk mitigation strategies, South Carolina Supreme Court, Step Down Provision in Noncompetition covenant
Court Awards Investment Bank $1.7 Million Advisory Fee Despite Lack of Direct Involvement in Business Sale
Uncover the intricacies of a recent M&A legal case where an investment banking firm secured a $1.7 million advisory fee, despite not being the procuring cause. Delve into the details of the Carriage Hill Management, LLC v. Boston Lobster Feast,…
Posted in investment banker/business broker Tagged with: $1.7 million, advisory fee, asset purchase agreement, Boston Lobster Feast, Business owners, Business Sale, Carriage Hill Management, CFOs, confidentiality agreement, contractual language, Court ruling, engagement agreement, financial obligations, Industry specifics, Investment Banking, Legal Developments, legal professionals, M&A landscape, M&A legal case, procurement cause, unforeseen obligations
Buyer Beware: Unforeseen Pension Liabilities in M&A Asset Deals
Dive into the complexities of M&A asset deals with our latest blog post, ‘Buyer Beware: Unforeseen Pension Liabilities.’ Explore the cautionary tale of a private equity group navigating the legal pitfalls of acquiring a Maui hotel and assets with unionized…
Posted in federal multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liability, successor liability Tagged with: actual knowledge, Asset Deals, Asset Valuation, Business owners, Business Regulations, business risks, business strategy, Business Transactions, Buyer's Awareness, Buyer's due diligence, Buyer's liability, Case Study, cautionary tale, CFOs, constructive knowledge, Contractual obligations, Corporate governance, Corporate Law, Court decision, Deal Success, due diligence, entrepreneurs, financial consequences, Financial Impact, Financial Repercussions, Industry specifics, legal battle, Legal compliance, legal insights, Legal lessons, legal pitfalls, Legal precedent, M&A, M&A Transactions, Maui Hotel Acquisition, merger and acquisition, Multiemployer Pension Plan, Ninth Circuit Court, Pension Liabilities, Private Equity, Purchase and Sale Agreement, Seller's obligations, Unfunded Pension Benefits, Union pension plan, Unionized Employees
Recent Comments