Explore a case study from March 10, 2020, involving a medical device company acquisition and the implications of not pursuing fraud/breach claims post-closing. Learn about the court’s ruling and the importance of timely action in M&A deals. March 10, 2020…
Blog Archives
Asset Buyer Can’t Recoup its Stale Fraud-Breach Claims Against Earnout
Posted in earn out, earn outs, recoupment doctrine, statute of limitations Tagged with: Asset buyer, Claros Diagnostics v. OPKO Health, contract breach, Delaware Court of Chancery, earnout, fraud-breach claims, M&A legal blog, medical device company acquisition, post-closing claims, statute of limitations
Court Decides EY Earnout Calculation as Arbitration, Not Expert Determination
Learn about a recent M&A case where a court ruled on the nature of an Ernst & Young earnout calculation, determining it as arbitration rather than expert determination. Get insights into the legal conflict and the court’s ruling. November 19,…
Posted in arbitration vs expert determination, dispute resolution provision, earn out, earn out dispute procedure, earn outs Tagged with: appellate court, arbitration, Court of Appeals of Indiana, dispute resolution, Earnout Calculation, Ernst & Young, expert determination, Inc. v. Mullholand, Indiana engineering business, legal conflict, M&A legal blog, purchase price adjustments, SGS North America, trial court case
Earnout Dispute: Lessons for Business Sellers
Explore the case of a Texas-based seller’s earnout dispute and the consequences of failing to verify earnout calculations. Learn valuable lessons for business sellers in M&A deals September 3, 2019 M&A Stories Introduction: When buying or selling a business, disagreements…
Posted in earn out, earn out dispute procedure, economic loss doctrine, fraud in business sale, fraud in the inducement exception Tagged with: business seller lessons, Delaware Federal District Court, dispute resolution, Earnout Calculation, earnout statements, economic loss doctrine, environmental management services, fraud claims, M&A earnout dispute, Richie v. Hillstone Environmental Partners, Texas seller
M&A Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause: How They Impact Seller Claims
Explore the crucial role of the APA Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause in a recent M&A case involving a Denver-based seller and a Houston-based buyer. Discover key allegations, the seller’s claim, the court’s decision, and the legal obstacles faced…
Posted in earn out, economic loss doctrine, exclusive remedy, integration clause Tagged with: Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business Closure, Case Reference: In Re Allonhill, Colorado Choice of Law, Contractual Remedies, Court's Decision, Denver-Based Seller, Earnout Payments, economic loss rule, Exclusive Remedy Clause, Houston-Based Buyer, integration clause, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Provisions in M&A, LLC, M&A Integration Provision, M&A legal blog, Material Misrepresentations, Negligent Misrepresentation, Seller Claims, Tort Liability
Recent Comments