Explore a case study where a fraud carve-out provision played a crucial role in protecting a buyer’s interests in an M&A deal. Learn about the legal intricacies surrounding employee non-solicitation claims and exclusive remedy provisions. October 19, 2019 Introduction: Many…
Blog Archives
How a Fraud Carve-Out Protected a Buyer’s Employee Non-Solicitation Claim in an M&A Deal
Posted in boilerplate provisions, fraud carveout, hiring seller's employees, nonsolicitation of employees and customers Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Breach of Covenant, Business acquisition, case reference, Employee Non-solicitation, exclusive remedy, fraud carve out, indemnification, Legal dispute, M&A, merger and acquisition, nonsolicitation covenant, Sacramento Federal Court, Trampoline Park
Employee Raiding Lawsuit: Buyer vs. Seller Employee
Explore a real case where a buyer sued a seller’s key employee over employee departures after an acquisition. Learn about the legal implications and strategies to mitigate such risks in M&A deals. October 16, 2019 Introduction: In acquisitions, a company’s…
Posted in employment agreement, hiring seller's employees, key employees of target, nonsolicitation of employees and customers, stay bonus Tagged with: Acquisition risks, asset purchase agreement, Buyer vs. seller employee, Employee raiding lawsuit, Employment agreement, Fiduciary duties, Key employee departure, M&A legal case, M&A litigation, pied piper rule, Risk mitigation strategy
Allegations of Breach in M&A Deal: Lessons from a $100 Million Case
Explore the intricate post-transaction landscape of M&A through a $100 million case involving an Atlanta-based chemical packaging company. Delve into the details of post-closing commitments, breaches, and legal implications, emphasizing the significance of post-closing covenants. M&A Stories November 21, 2018…
Posted in covenant not to compete, hiring seller's employees, no kickback or bribe rep, nondisclosure agreement, trade secret misappropriation Tagged with: Breach of contract, Business acquisitions, Confidentiality clauses, Delaware lawsuit, Enforceability of covenants, Kickback payment representation, M&A legal case study, M&A litigation, Noncompetition agreements, Post-closing commitments
Dispute Over Severance Payments: A Lesson in Clear Contract Language
Explore the legal battle in Perrigo Company v. International Vitamin Corporation, highlighting the importance of clear contract language in M&A transactions. Learn how a complex asset purchase agreement led to a $1.2 million reimbursement dispute and the lessons for avoiding…
Posted in hiring seller's employees, overly complicated language in contract Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Business sale conflicts, Clear Contract Language, Complex agreements, International Vitamin Corporation, Legal battle in Delaware, Lessons in contract clarity, M&A legal dispute, Perrigo Company, Severance payments
Asset Buyer Not Liable for Race Discrimination Claim in Employee Hiring Dispute
Explore the legal intricacies of mergers and acquisitions in our latest blog post. Delve into the case of Mance v. Owings Mills Autos, LLC, as we dissect the liabilities of asset buyers regarding employee claims post-acquisition. Gain insights into asset…
Posted in hiring seller's employees, third party beneficiary clause Tagged with: Asset acquisition, Asset buyer obligations, Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business acquisitions, buyer liabilities, Corporate governance, Corporate Law, Corporate transactions, Employee rights, Employment disputes, Employment transition, Legal Liabilities, legal nuances, legal principles, M&A legal, Mance v. Owings Mills Autos LLC, Merger legalities, Race discrimination, Seller expectations, Third-party beneficiary clause
Recent Comments