Explore the intricacies of M&A transactions through the lens of a recent legal battle in Brooklyn, where a buyer challenges a seller’s anti-reliance clause after a business deal goes awry. This insightful blog delves into the importance of clearly defining…
Blog Archives
M&A Buyer Challenges Seller’s NY Anti-Reliance Clause in Fraud Suit
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, asset purchase, Brooklyn trial court, Business acquisitions, business litigation, buyer protections, Case Study, commercial litigation, contract law, fraud suit, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Precedents, M&A dispute, M&A legal issues, M&A transaction tips, net income misrepresentation, New York law, Purchase agreement, representations and warranties, seller strategies
Court Approves Seller’s Fraud Lawsuit in Earnout Dispute
Explore a real-life M&A dispute where a seller’s fraud lawsuit against a buyer over an earnout disagreement led to a court ruling. Gain insights into the legal intricacies of this case and the implications for M&A agreements. November 6, 2019…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, earn outs, integration clause Tagged with: anti-reliance provision, earnout dispute, fraud lawsuit, Gruner v. Huron Consulting Group, Illinois common law, Illinois Securities Law, Inc., integration clause, Keywords: M&A lawsuit, legal analytics company, stock purchase agreement
M&A Deal Lessons: Honesty and Due Diligence Are Key
Learn from a real M&A case involving digital marketing and concessions. Discover the importance of honesty and due diligence in M&A deals. Get insights from the Cinema Scene Marketing & Promotions, Inc. v. Calident Capital, LLC case. M&A Stories November…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, due diligence, extra-contractual fraud, negligent misrepresentation, reliance Tagged with: Antitrust concerns, Cinema Scene Marketing & Promotions case, Competition in M&A, Digital marketing company acquisition, Due diligence importance, Honesty in M&A, Legal dispute resolution, M&A case study, M&A deal lessons, Private equity firm negotiations
Clarifying Securities Fraud Claims in M&A: Lessons from O’Connor v. Cory
Explore the intricacies of federal securities fraud claims in M&A through the lens of O’Connor v. Cory. This blog delves into a notable case, emphasizing the importance of clarity in purchase agreements and offering key takeaways for sellers in similar…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale, full disclosure rep, reliance Tagged with: Business experience in negotiations, Business valuation in M&A, Dallas federal district court, Disclaimer of reliance, Due diligence in M&A, Equity in purchase price, federal securities fraud, fraud carve out, Full disclosure representation, Legal proceedings in M&A, M&A legal, Material Facts Disclosure, O’Connor v. Cory, Purchase agreement, Purchase documents evaluation, representations and warranties, Securities Fraud Claims, Seller's Lawsuit
Court Decision: Buyer Unable to Sue Seller for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in Target’s Data Room
Dive into the intricate world of M&A transactions with our latest blog post on an important Delaware court decision. Uncover the legal nuances surrounding buyer-seller relationships, data room disclosures, and the impact of contractual agreements. Gain valuable insights into the…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, Breach of contract, Business acquisitions, buyer protection, Buyer-seller relationships, Chyronhego Corporation v. Wight, Contractual agreements, data room disclosures, Delaware court decision, due diligence, financial projections, fraudulent misrepresentations, Indemnification caps, Industry Insights, industry-specific coverage, legal analysis, Legal Developments, legal implications, legal recourse, M&A deals, M&A Transactions, seller responsibilities, stock purchase agreement
Recent Comments