BUYER OF SEARS ASSETS IN 2019 ACQUISITION NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SEARS’ 2015 CUSTOMER WARRANTY LAWSUIT

Share

The buyer, in the asset purchase agreement, assumed warranty obligations owed to pre-closing sales made to Sears customers, except for customer claims made prior to the closing date.

M&A Stories

October 10, 2022

Introduction

In 2019, the buyer of Sears assets, acquired during Sears’ bankruptcy, was not held liable for a customer class action lawsuit filed in 2015 concerning warranty claims.

Background

Sears, which had filed for bankruptcy in 2018, faced a class action lawsuit in 2015 from customers seeking compensation for home appliances covered under Master Protection Agreements.

The Acquisition

The buyer purchased Sears’ assets out of bankruptcy for $5.2 billion in 2019. As part of the asset purchase agreement, the buyer assumed warranty obligations for pre-closing sales to Sears customers, with the exception of claims made before the closing date.

The Lawsuit

Following the acquisition, the class action customers argued that the buyer was responsible for the Master Protection Agreements. They referred to the “assumed liabilities” provision in the asset purchase agreement, which stated that the buyer would assume liabilities for warranties and protection agreements related to goods and services sold by Sears prior to the closing.

However, the buyer invoked the “excluded liabilities” provision, which clarified that they were not responsible for customer claims made prior to the closing, including the 2015 class action lawsuit. The court sided with the buyer, stating that they had agreed to assume liabilities for warranties and protection agreements but not for pending claims or litigation related to those agreements.

See In Re Sears Holdings Corporation, No. 21 Civ. 5437 (NSR), United States District Court, S.D. New York, (September 27, 2022).

Conclusion 

This case involved interpreting the “Assumed Liabilities” and “Excluded Liabilities” provisions. Despite the complex language, the court concluded that the buyer was not obligated to address the class action lawsuit, which had been filed four years before the acquisition.

By John McCauley: I write about recent legal problems of buyer and sellers of small businesses.

Email:             jmccauley@mk-law.com

Profile:            http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm

Telephone:      714 273-6291

Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles

Legal Disclaimer

The blogs on this website are provided as a resource for general information for the public. The information on these web pages is not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular legal matter. The information on these web pages is subject to change at any time and may be incomplete and/or may contain errors. You should not rely on these pages without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Posted in problems with customers Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

Categories